Want to share your content on python-bloggers? click here.
In our recent note What is new for rquery
December 2019 we mentioned an ugly processing pipeline that translates into SQL
of varying size/quality depending on the query generator we use. In this note we try a near-relative of that query in the data_algebra
.
dplyr
translates the query to SQL
as:
SELECT 5.0 AS `x`, `sum23`
FROM (SELECT `col1`, `col2`, `col3`, `sum23`, 4.0 AS `x`
FROM (SELECT `col1`, `col2`, `col3`, `sum23`, 3.0 AS `x`
FROM (SELECT `col1`, `col2`, `col3`, `sum23`, 2.0 AS `x`
FROM (SELECT `col1`, `col2`, `col3`, `sum23`, 1.0 AS `x`
FROM (SELECT `col1`, `col2`, `col3`, `col2` + `col3` AS `sum23`
FROM `d`)))))
rquery
translates the query to SQL
as:
SELECT
"x",
"sum23"
FROM (
SELECT
"col2" + "col3" AS "sum23",
5 AS "x"
FROM (
SELECT
"col2",
"col3"
FROM
"example_table"
) tsql_28722584463189084716_0000000000
) tsql_28722584463189084716_0000000001
Notice the rquery
SQL
doesn’t copy the column col1
around, and also skips the dead-values assigned into x
. The query still has some waste: the inner and outer guard queries that are used to make SQL
look a bit more regular.
What I would like to add is our new note, showing what the data_algebra
translates a similar query into the following SQL
:
SELECT 5 AS "x",
"col2" + "col3" AS "sum23",
"col3"
FROM "d"
(The extra col3
as we asked for that column to be part of the result in the newer demonstration.) This new query has fewer unnecessary steps. The idea is one can code intent step-wise in a pipeline and still end up with a fairly compact and performant SQL
query in the end.
I think both rquery
and data_algebra
can save quite a lot of development resources and machine time in data wrangling tasks.
Want to share your content on python-bloggers? click here.